Skip to content

A City of Convivial Study

A wooden chipboard scaffolding holding several rudimentary desks, stools, a chalkboard with a complex diagram, a projected collage
The Future Schools exhibition at the National Academy of Design. Photo by Shannon.

In his 1973 Tools for Conviviality, theologian and philosopher Ivan Illich distinguished between two different kinds of tools, which he conceived broadly to encompass “all rationally designed devices,” from gadgets to rules to institutions. Industrially produced tools discipline their users and dictate their self-image, leading to “dependence, exploitation, and impotence.” By contrast, convivial tools enable autonomous action, giving “each person who uses them the greatest opportunity to enrich the environment with the fruits of [their] vision.” A convivial society, Illich wrote, “should be designed to allow all its members the most autonomous action by means of tools least controlled by others.”

Today, it’s clear that the United States’ dominant educational systems and the tools powering them are industrially produced. Universities have metastasized into sports media empires, real-estate development corporations, and finishing schools for American industry. Private equity managers and tech executives dominate college boards. University leaders outsource foundational decisions to ed-tech firms and management consultants whose products transform education into an instrumental, transactional, surveillant, extractive enterprise.

The fecund field of critical university studies (there’s a lot of fertilizer these days!) has historicized and power-mapped this devolution. And in recent years, as faculty, staff, and students from across the country have watched their institutional leaders capitulate to a fascistic, anti-intellectual, truth-warping regime that extends from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley, most of academia’s denizens — recognizing that this precious and precarious educational system is unsustainable — are committed to institutional critique and, even amidst diminishing hope, building things anew.

A screenshot of the website for my "Redesigning the Academy" class website. We see nine images, each linking to a weekly lesson; those lessons cover topics ranging from the syllabus as a genre, to academia's complex legacies, to hopeful alternative schools

In 2022, in my final year as a full professor at The New School, I sought to engage with the painfully palpable and ever-more pervasive student and faculty disillusionment by cataloguing higher education’s threats and weaknesses — and by imagining how things could be different, better, more convivial. In creating “Redesigning the Academy” I drew on my own 20+ years’ experience as a faculty member and department administrator, my early engagement with alternative educational communities like the Public School, and my lifelong commitment to convivial learning. In that class we explored the broad terrain and deep history of alternative education, para-institutional schools, intentional learning communities, and other experimental modes of study — including many examples right here in New York City.

A screenshot of my Para-/Extra-Institutional Schools Arena channel, featuring dozens of blocks, each featuring a thumbnail image representing a different school or relevant resource

Those same precedents and principles, filtered through my professional experience, have inspired the Cross-Reference Coalition, which we offer as a forum for convivial study and collaboration in this age of industrialized, automated ignorance and impotence. What follows are a range of resources that cultivate the context for our work together: